This
year, my cooperating teacher decided to implement a standards based grading
system for our freshmen English classes.
For
me, it has been quite the learning experience since I’ve never seen a standards
based grading system in the works, so I was interested to see how to manage it.
For my cooperating teacher, it has also been a learning experience, since this
is her first year using it.
At
the beginning, it was a little rocky. My cooperating teacher had picked out
five writing and five reading standards that we were going to focus on this
semester, and we asked the students to rate themselves based on their abilities
with each standard. Students took this paper home, and asked for parent input
on their ratings. Parents then had to sign off on these papers.
Students
had the option to pick ratings of 5 or less, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10. Until we had
gathered enough data from students, we used these as a gauge to see where they were.
As
we gathered data, it became clear that we needed an intensive organizational
system since two of us were looking over the work, and it took us awhile to
figure out what that would look like, but now, we’ve fallen into a pattern.
However,
if there is one thing I have noticed about this grading system, it’s that it is
incredibly time consuming.
For
every freshmen paper/assignment I grade, I make thorough comments on the
document, then I go to a website my cooperating teacher and I use to make notes
for each student and I write a detailed paragraph about the student’s progress
with the piece and what they should continue to work on, and then I make a
record of whether or not their score should change on a chart that I have
printed out.
From
there, my cooperating teacher and I set up a date to conference about each
student and discuss where we both feel their scores are. Conferencing is the
fasted part of the process. Typically, we are on the same page when it comes to scores.
When
I am no longer student teaching next semester, I’m curious about how my
cooperating teacher will manage the workload. Despite me teaching for some time now, my cooperating teacher and I have been splitting the grading because it
is so time consuming.
One
of the biggest issues I’ve noticed with this grading system is that it doesn’t
hold student’s accountable.
If
a student doesn’t turn in a paper/assignment, nothing happens. Their grade stays
the same.
I’ve
had several students throughout this semester neglect to turn things in, and
for each paper/assignment that is turned in, at least six students in each
class fail to turn it in on time.
Out
of these six students, maybe three will turn it in a few days late. One or two
may turn it in a week late, but inevitably, at least one student in each of my
freshmen classes neglects to turn the assignment in completely. Typically, it
is the same student(s) with each paper/assignment.
Because
of this, I’ve talked to my cooperating teacher about adding a score for
commitment and organization. In our gradebook, each standard is out of ten
points, so I’ve suggested that this be made into another “assignment,” in the
gradebook so that it is clear whether or not a student is turning in their work.
Additionally, this will reward the students that do the work, but are
struggling to grasp the concepts.
No comments :
Post a Comment